Review Room
Every review you bring in, each one put against the person it names. Nobody is credited until a manager says so.
Reviews, last 7 days
3
the week to Mon, Oct 26, the last day anything came in
Mean rating, that week
5.0
across 3 reviews
Waiting to be counted
5
proposed credits, none of them scoring yet
Worth a look
1
patterns nobody has read yet
Narrow it down
Tripadvisor is not connected — nothing has been read from it, so it shows no reviews rather than zero reviews. No review platform has given us credentials yet; their reviews here arrived as a CSV export. 25 notes came from the group's own feedback form, shown unsigned as “Our own form”.
Waiting to be counted
Each one is a guess about who a review is thanking, with the words it matched on. Confirm it and it counts on the board. Reject it and it never does.
- internal5★Genevieve Marshexact90% sure
Second time this month, both great. (Named on the form: Genevieve.)
Matched on “Genevieve”
- internal5★Beckett Lowryexact90% sure
The pacing between courses was long. (Named on the form: Beckett.)
Matched on “Beckett”
- internal5★Delia Fontaineexact90% sure
Second time this month, both great. (Named on the form: Delia.)
Matched on “Delia”
- internal5★Antonia Wexlerexact90% sure
Our server was lovely, the kitchen was slow. (Named on the form: Antonia.)
Matched on “Antonia”
- internal5★Rodrigo Pastranaexact90% sure
Our server was lovely, the kitchen was slow. (Named on the form: Rodrigo.)
Matched on “Rodrigo”
The staff board
Confirmed credits only. 5 attributions are still waiting to be confirmed and are not counted here. A credit nobody confirmed is a guess, and a guess should never settle who won the month.
Nothing has been confirmed yet. The board fills in as the queue above is worked through.
Worth a look
Patterns in the reviews themselves, put in front of a person to read. None of this is an accusation and none of it touches anyone’s standing. Read the reviews side by side and decide what it is.
- The same words, more than onceThe Copper Jaystrength of the signal 60 of 100
5 reviews share near-identical wording (78% average overlap), all within 24 days. 5 of them carry no author name, so the profiles behind them cannot be counted. Worth reading side by side before contest points are counted.
Our own form5★Fri, Sep 25· the one flaggedOur server was lovely, the kitchen was slow. (Named on the form: Rodrigo.)
No name on it
Our own form4★Sat, Oct 10Our server was lovely, the kitchen was slow. (Named on the form: Genevieve.)
No name on it
Our own form5★Sat, Oct 10Our server was lovely, the kitchen was slow. (Named on the form: Antonia.)
No name on it
Everything that came in
The 9 newest of 9 reviews in view, all sources together.
| When | Where | Platform | Stars | What they wrote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, Oct 23 | The Copper Jay | Our own form | 5★ | Second time this month, both great. (Named on the form: Genevieve.) |
| Tue, Oct 20 | The Copper Jay | Our own form | 5★ | The pacing between courses was long. (Named on the form: Beckett.) |
| Tue, Oct 20 | The Copper Jay | Our own form | 5★ | Second time this month, both great. (Named on the form: Delia.) |
| Sun, Oct 18 | The Copper Jay | Our own form | 5★ | The pacing between courses was long. |
| Tue, Oct 13 | The Copper Jay | Our own form | 5★ | The pacing between courses was long. |
| Sat, Oct 10 | The Copper Jay | Our own form | 5★ | Our server was lovely, the kitchen was slow. (Named on the form: Antonia.)Attentiveness and warmth38% sure |
| Wed, Sep 30 | The Copper Jay | Our own form | 5★ | The pacing between courses was long. |
| Sun, Sep 27 | The Copper Jay | Our own form | 5★ | Portion sizes have shrunk.Portion size36% sure |
| Fri, Sep 25 | The Copper Jay | Our own form | 5★ | Our server was lovely, the kitchen was slow. (Named on the form: Rodrigo.)Attentiveness and warmth38% sure |