Review Room
Every review you bring in, each one put against the person it names. Nobody is credited until a manager says so.
Reviews, last 7 days
1
the week to Wed, Oct 28, the last day anything came in
Mean rating, that week
5.0
across 1 reviews
Waiting to be counted
4
proposed credits, none of them scoring yet
Worth a look
1
patterns nobody has read yet
Narrow it down
Tripadvisor is not connected — nothing has been read from it, so it shows no reviews rather than zero reviews. No review platform has given us credentials yet; their reviews here arrived as a CSV export. 29 notes came from the group's own feedback form, shown unsigned as “Our own form”.
Waiting to be counted
Each one is a guess about who a review is thanking, with the words it matched on. Confirm it and it counts on the board. Reject it and it never does.
- internal5★Tobias Lindgrenexact90% sure
Our server was lovely, the kitchen was slow. (Named on the form: Tobias.)
Matched on “Tobias”
- internal5★Tobias Lindgrenexact90% sure
Wine list is the best in the city. (Named on the form: Tobias.)
Matched on “Tobias”
2 people on the Little Fern roster answer to “Daniel”. One review credits one person: confirm whoever had the table and say no to the rest.
internal5★Daniel Okonjoexact45% sureEverything was on point tonight. (Named on the form: Daniel.)
Matched on “Daniel”
internal5★Daniel Reyesexact45% sureEverything was on point tonight. (Named on the form: Daniel.)
Matched on “Daniel”
The staff board
Confirmed credits only. 4 attributions are still waiting to be confirmed and are not counted here. A credit nobody confirmed is a guess, and a guess should never settle who won the month.
Nothing has been confirmed yet. The board fills in as the queue above is worked through.
Worth a look
Patterns in the reviews themselves, put in front of a person to read. None of this is an accusation and none of it touches anyone’s standing. Read the reviews side by side and decide what it is.
- The same words, more than onceLittle Fernstrength of the signal 33 of 100
2 reviews share near-identical wording (73% average overlap), all within 2 days. 2 of them carry no author name, so the profiles behind them cannot be counted. Worth reading side by side before contest points are counted.
Our own form5★Mon, Oct 5· the one flaggedWine list is the best in the city. (Named on the form: Tobias.)
No name on it
Our own form4★Wed, Oct 7Wine list is the best in the city. (Named on the form: Margarethe.)
No name on it
Everything that came in
The 12 newest of 12 reviews in view, all sources together.
| When | Where | Platform | Stars | What they wrote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, Oct 27 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Portion sizes have shrunk.Portion size36% sure |
| Mon, Oct 19 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Everything was on point tonight. |
| Mon, Oct 19 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Our server was lovely, the kitchen was slow. (Named on the form: Tobias.)Attentiveness and warmth38% sure |
| Sun, Oct 18 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Bathroom needs attention. |
| Fri, Oct 16 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | The pacing between courses was long. |
| Tue, Oct 6 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Bathroom needs attention. |
| Mon, Oct 5 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Wine list is the best in the city. (Named on the form: Tobias.)Wine72% sure |
| Sat, Oct 3 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Wine list is the best in the city.Wine72% sure |
| Fri, Oct 2 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Everything was on point tonight. (Named on the form: Daniel.) |
| Wed, Sep 30 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Our server was lovely, the kitchen was slow.Attentiveness and warmth38% sure |
| Mon, Sep 28 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Wine list is the best in the city.Wine72% sure |
| Wed, Sep 23 | Little Fern | Our own form | 5★ | Bathroom needs attention. |